Why Are Physicians Selling Their Practices?
The healthcare services landscape is rapidly evolving, and new challenges are placing pressure on independent practice groups to seek alternatives for long-term success. While private practices are familiar with the more macro factors, lowering reimbursement rates and industry consolidation have become prevalent over the past decade, resulting in strain on the private practice model.
To combat this, many groups are turning towards strategic partnerships – whether it be with private equity (PE), strategic aggregators, or health systems – to foster sustainable futures. Every physician group is different, and it is important to weigh all factors when deciding which model most closely aligns with each group’s goals.
Pros & Cons of Partnership Models
Private Equity (High Risk, High Reward) – While PE has historically come under scrutiny for its involvement in healthcare services, investors have learned through the trials and tribulations that the biggest asset in physician practice deals are the physicians themselves and the delivery of high-quality clinical care. With this, PE generally leaves the physicians with full clinical autonomy and more so focuses on driving business-related decisions.
Pros:
- High degree of physician autonomy
- Nimbleness in decision making & resources for growth
- Liquidity & high financial upside (physician rollover equity is valuable)
Cons:
- Trade-off a fraction of compensation in exchange for up-front consideration (“scrape”)
- Investors on the board of the platform will have influence in decision making
- High-risk with uncertainty of the next partnership after the sale
Strategic Aggregator (Medium Risk, Medium Reward) – Another unique partnership model is with strategic aggregators, particularly those investing in surgical facilities. This model bridges the gap between traditional PE and health systems, from a financial perspective, similar to PE but come in with a network of facilities that may deliver the resources and negotiating power closer to that of a health system.
Pros:
- Long-term partnership delivers physicians comfortability in who they will be partnered with
- Preexisting infrastructure can be leveraged to derive operational & financial synergies
- Creative structuring can ensure physicians still have equity ownership
Cons:
- Partial loss of clinical autonomy
- Potential misalignment of core focuses
- Semi-limited financial upside (no “second bite” transaction)
Hospital-Employed (Low Risk, Low Reward) – The hospital-employed model is often one that is most contemplated by physicians, whether it be out of medical school or after having an established practice. Health systems often demonstrate a strong referral network and high reimbursement rates, fostering comfortability for physicians wishing to avoid the stressors affiliated with other models.
Pros:
- Earnings stability
- Ability to leverage health network infrastructure & referral bases
- Removal of any business risk
Cons:
- Loss of autonomy
- Slower decision-making (hospitals often move “slower” with change)
- Limited financial upside
Factors Influencing the Decision of “Who” to Partner With
As private practices decide who to enter a strategic partnership with, consider these factors:
- Financial: Overall valuation & terms of the initial deal; Go-forward compensation; Future equity upside
- Operational: Ability to leverage existing infrastructure; Recruiting capabilities; Payor contracting
- Cultural: The handling of younger physicians vs. senior physicians; Nearby partnerships geographically; Alignment of goals
The Lesson
Physician practice consolidation is here to stay and will continue to accelerate over the years. It’s important for private practices to be open-minded and aware of the factors influencing physician practice exits so, in the event one was to choose to pursue these discussions, they are well-equipped with the knowledge to make sure the decision they are making is the “right” one. There’s no single model that fits every situation, and there’s a track record of both success and failure amongst them all.
By Josh Paul & Joe Pennington
Josh Paul is a Senior Vice President at Hyde Park Capital with deep expertise in physician practice M&A. Throughout his career, Josh has worked with numerous practices across orthopedics, pain management, anesthesiology, urology, ophthalmology, home healthcare, and more, leading the execution of more than $1 billion in enterprise value.
Joe Pennington is a Vice President at Hyde Park Capital with a focus on healthcare M&A. At Hyde Park, Joe has worked with multiple orthopedic and pain management practices in sell-side processes, ensuring each transaction is as transparent, efficient, and smooth as possible.
pennington@hydeparkcapital.com
Clicking some links in this article will take you to websites independent of and unaffiliate with Hyde Park Capital. The information and services provided on these independent sites are not reviewed, guaranteed, or endorsed by Hyde Park Capital or its affiliates. Please keep in mind that these independent sites’ terms and conditions, privacy and security policies, or other legal information may be different.